Administration Law Notes

Facts: Petitioner filed a complaint for libel against respondents. It applies where a claim is originally cognizable in the courts, and comes into play whenever enforcement of the claim requires the resolution of issues which, under a regulatory scheme, have been placed within the special competence of an administrative agency.administrative law

Authority in the global legal order is being increasingly exercised in a horizontal way, through non-hierarchical means.6 Against this background, the final aim of this paper is to show that the best way to monitor performance of implementation of global rules based on indicators is the peer review system and other forms of horizontal monitoring.

By providing that the President, the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Heads of the Constitutional Commissions may be authorized to augment any item in the GAA for their respective offices,” Section 25(5) has delineated borders between their offices, such that funds appropriated for one office are prohibited from crossing over to another office even in the guise of augmentation of a deficient item or items.administrative law

In Energy Regulatory Board v. CA, we echoed the basic rule that the courts will not interfere in matters which are addressed to the sound discretion of government agencies entrusted with the regulation of activities coming under the special technical knowledge and training of such agencies.

He was sustained by respondent court which rendered its decision declaring the decision of the Police Commission as null and void and ordered the town mayor to reinstate the plaintiff to his former position as patrolman in the Police Department of San Juan, Rizal…” Respondent court ruled that the decision of petitioner commission was based on incomplete records as there was no transcript of the testimonies of witnesses or minutes of the proceedings before the Board of Investigators and that the commission’s conclusion was without factual basis and was in violation of administrative due process.administrative law