III. El Paso County District Courtroom Case 11

To support his claim in the Complaint, the facts began by looking again to the 1996 divorce proceedings and then moved through the 2003 movement to modify little one help to her unemployment in 2005 to indicate she would not have waited until March 2009 to attempt to gather the momentary assist owed to her and would not have moved to dismiss her motion to change if she was owed any momentary support, nor would she have failed to make a claim to it on the date she signed the perjured Affidavit of Custody and Direct Assist.constitutional law

Though his communications continued to fail to supply the desired breakthrough needed to keep away from the threatened lawsuit, he remained hopeful that exposing the unhealthy practices of El Paso County’s youngster help enforcement contractor would bring about changes in the way in which the child help enforcement system, including courts, treated fathers.

Paragraphs one hundred seventy five-192 disclosed info associated to Mr. Johnson’s calculation of arrears for child help withheld in protest since the opening of the kid help enforcement case and continued the presentation of info pertaining to the intentional infliction of emotional distress by State and County youngster support enforcement authorities and the Customer.constitutional law

The company chapter is carried out underneath the company public policy of the company Federal Authorities in corporate Washington D.C. The states use state public coverage to hold out Federal public policy of Washington D.C. Public policy and only public coverage is being administered in opposition to you in the company courts as we speak.constitutional law

In October 2010, Mr. Johnson made his first public remark to the Board of County Commissioners to complain about their failure to respond to his mailings and to precise opposition to one other County contract with PSI and its legal companies contractor, Belveal, Eigel, Rumans & Fredrickson, LLC.