These facts led to the presentation of facts from the hearing in paragraphs 332-462 that demonstrated how Ms. Eigel committed fraud upon the court with Magistrate Lyle’s assistance and how they obstructed justice and denied Mr. Johnson’s rights to due process and the equal protection of the laws in violation of the Colorado Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution under the color of law and legal custom.
The main difference between the type of animals permitted under the Fair Housing Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, is that the Fair Housing Act permits any and all types of animals (subject to the animal being a direct threat to the health or safety of others or unreasonable) to be an emotional support animal” that provides emotional support, well-being, comfort, or companionship for a person with mental illness or psychiatric disability.
Mr. Johnson was seeking to compel the Court to take action to uphold the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure and to protect his constitutional rights to due process and the equal protection of the laws and to help the Customer understand the three motions before the Court.
The legislatures have passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they float the indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone into court to challenge them by telling them it is not your public policy to assume the debts of other people.
That’s why you’ll find stamped on many if not all our briefs, THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY OTHER CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS.” The reason for this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or file a claim we are NOT supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure.